
How 9Marxists Learned to Fence Out Kids and Vote In Pagans
As I logged on to socials the day after the election, I was less than surprised to be reminded of Mark Dever’s reaction to previous election cycles with a tip of his hat to multi-faith democracy: “I’m a fundamentalist Christian, but I’m happy to have Muslims, Jews, liberal Christians, and non-religious types in our government.”
Dever, bless his “Reformed” heart, is the headmaster of the 9Marks school of ecclesiastical scrupulosity where every doctrine is ironed flat, baptized in lukewarm water (at the appropriate age of course), and served with a polite nod. He has spent years teaching that the church must be as pure as the driven snow, which apparently means keeping believing children off the sled until they’re old enough to file their own taxes.
I must confess: back in my cage-stage years, I was a proud alumnus of Dever’s School of Ecclesiastical Sterility. The tidy logic of it all gave form to what evangelical mush had left behind. It felt safer to doubt my children’s faith than to risk presuming upon grace. I examined them with a skeptical squint, telling myself I was protecting the purity of the church, when in reality I was protecting my own sense of control. I patted myself on the back for being a careful, reasonable Baptist when what really existed was a dad with more logic than love and no good answer to the question: “What is the whole bible trying to communicate?”
And here’s the problem: when you excommunicate the covenant kids from Christ’s table, you will eventually invite the pagans to rule your nation’s table.
Same hermeneutic, different restaurant.
All through Scripture, God understands mixed company. He called Abraham and his offspring. He fed the Passover lamb to households where toddlers asked, “What’s this all about, Dad?” (Ex. 12:26). He made sure the whole congregation of Judah men, women, and “little ones” stood before Him (2 Chron. 20:13). When the Spirit fell at Pentecost, Peter didn’t say, “This promise is for you and your youth group when they’re seventeen.” No, he said, “For you and your children” (Acts 2:39).
In short: God keeps dragging kids to the family table of remembrance, often in spite of us.
I can hear the gasps of my respectable brothers as they clutch their 1 Corinthians 11 pearls. My over-simplified version of the argument goes like this: “Paul said examine yourself, and little Timmy can’t define justification yet.” But Paul’s rebuke was never about immature intellects; it was about bloated bellies. Some saints were getting sloshed on communion wine while others went hungry. The “unworthy manner” was snobbery, not infancy.
Paul’s fix wasn’t “install a theological bouncer at the door.” It was “wait for one another.” The solution to arrogance isn’t exclusion, it’s repentance. The only people in this instance Paul would have us keep from the table are the unrepentant gluttons (and probably the one who tries to keep back believing children from table fellowship with Christ. See Matthew 19:14), not the baptized six-year-olds who believe Jesus loves them and don’t yet know how to spell propitiation.
When Jesus broke the bread and said, “Do this in remembrance of Me,” He wasn’t instituting a private mystical moment; He was inaugurating a family meal. Remembrance, biblically speaking, is not closing your eyes and thinking hard about Calvary until you feel something. It’s covenant renewal putting God’s faithfulness on public display.
So when we tell our children, “Not yet, honey, Daddy’s communing with God right now,” we are catechizing unbelief. We’re teaching them that Christ’s body is too holy for covenant kids and too polite to overturn Pharisaical tables.
From the Lord’s Table to the Statehouse Table
Now trace the line. If we can’t discern who belongs at the Supper, we won’t discern who belongs in the Senate. The same logic that withholds bread from the confessing kindergartener, will hand a gavel to the God-hating politician.
Scripture doesn’t blush about this. Civil rulers are to be “men who fear God” (Ex. 18:21). The king must be one “from among your brothers” (Deut. 17:15). The magistrate is “God’s servant” (Rom. 13:4), not a neutral technocrat managing a cosmic HOA. When the righteous rule, the people rejoice (Prov. 29:2). When the wicked rule, we get congressional hearings and inflation.
Dever says he’s fine with pagans in power. Of course he is. His theology is perfectly domesticated for it. It’s more smoke billowing from an already raging fire. A privatized, pietistic gospel produces privatized, pietistic citizens. And privatized citizens elect godless bureaucrats who privatize your freedom right into oblivion.
This is what happens when the gospel is treated like a spiritual vitamin instead of a Kingdom proclamation. We baptize as few as possible, we commune as seldom as possible, and we expect as little as possible when it comes to Gospel power redeeming fallen creation. Then we with glazed eyes wonder why the culture has gone feral.
The apostles didn’t preach, “Receive Jesus into your heart and mind your own business.” They preached, “Jesus is Lord, therefore repent, be baptized, and obey Him in everything.” That’s corporate. That’s public. That’s political.
Our forefathers bled for a republic under God because they actually believed in a God who ruled. Today we shrug and vote for whichever pagan promises not to burn the flag too often. That’s not humility; that’s theological anemia.
A Modest Proposal
Maybe, just maybe, we should stop handing out the Supper like it’s a post-doctoral degree and start giving it like it’s a covenant meal. Maybe we should raise our kids expecting the shockwaves of resurrection to shake through their very bones. Maybe we should elect rulers who fear God instead of those who fear the latest poll.
Because here’s the thing: the gospel doesn’t stop at the threshold of your soul. It wants your dinner table, your town, your legislature, and your nation.
It wants everything.
And if that sounds too public, too political, too earthly, remember this: Jesus didn’t teach us to pray, “Thy kingdom stay in heaven.”







